From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Prater

United States District Court, M.D. Florida
Dec 5, 2003
Case No. 8:02-cv-2052-T-23MSS (M.D. Fla. Dec. 5, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 8:02-cv-2052-T-23MSS

December 5, 2003


ORDER


The United States1 motion for reconsideration of paragraph 11 of the contempt order (Doc. 85) is DENIED. Either the United States or Prater ultimately must pay the costs of this action, including the cost of a Special Master. Under the present order, the United States merelyadvances the costs, subject to subsequent assessment against Prater, if the United States prevails and if Prater has sufficient assets. Like every other litigant, the United States must evaluate the costs versus the benefits of litigation, accounting realistically the prospect that Prater might prevail or that the United States1 assessment of Prater's assets is erroneous. However, in the interim, the Special Master is devoting valuable time to an undertaking triggered by the United States for the benefit of the United States (and the public). At the conclusion of the matter (and at other times), the risk of non-payment should not fall on the Special Master. The United States is the only reliable source of payment. (Of course, nothing prohibits the United States' applying for interim payments from identified funds under proper circumstances.)

ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Prater

United States District Court, M.D. Florida
Dec 5, 2003
Case No. 8:02-cv-2052-T-23MSS (M.D. Fla. Dec. 5, 2003)
Case details for

U.S. v. Prater

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. CAREL A. PRATER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida

Date published: Dec 5, 2003

Citations

Case No. 8:02-cv-2052-T-23MSS (M.D. Fla. Dec. 5, 2003)