Opinion
04 Crim. 1033 (LAK).
March 1, 2007
ORDER
Defendant moves "to hold present PSR null void" and "to reconsider arresting judgment."
Although defendant correctly notes a typographical error in the Court's November 22, 2006 memorandum opinion, nothing turns on that error. Accordingly, the motions are denied. The phrase "for a 3 — day extension of time on the Rule 29 motion." that appears on page 4 of the November 22, 2006 decision is corrected to read "for a 30 — day extension of time on the Rule 29 motion."
SO ORDERED.