From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Pinney

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cr-0241 MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-cr-0241 MCE.

February 24, 2006

Shari Rusk, Bar No. 170313, Attorney at Law, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Defendant, Robert Pinney.

Ellen Endrizzi, Assistant United States Attorney.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE


Defendant Robert Pinney is charged in an indictment alleging three counts of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ s. 841(a)(1) 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) — Conspiracy to Distribute Methamphetamine and Felon in Possession of a Firearm. Subsequent to the filing of motions in this matter, the parties reached a potential negotiated settlement. It is necessary for the parties to meet to accomplish the final goals before formalizing this agreement. A status conference was set for February 21, 2006. The parties need additional time to meet, therefore the parties request that the Status Conference be continued to April 4, 2006 and that time be excluded.

The parties agree that time should be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(i) for defense preparation and under local code T4.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court finds excludable time through April 4, 2006, based on Local Code T4, giving counsel reasonable time to prepare.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Pinney

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2006
Case No. 2:04-cr-0241 MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Pinney

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert Pinney, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:04-cr-0241 MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2006)