From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Pineda

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 16, 2011
CASE NO. 1:03cr48-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:03cr48-SPM/GRJ.

March 16, 2011


ORDER


THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (doc. 327) dated January 26, 2011. Defendant was furnished a copy, and has filed objections (doc. 329).

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I find that the report and recommendation should be adopted. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Defendant has not shown deficient performance or prejudice from Mr. Edwards' representation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The report and recommendation (doc. 327) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The § 2255 motion to vacate (doc. 287) is denied.

3. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Defendant has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Pineda

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 16, 2011
CASE NO. 1:03cr48-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Pineda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ENRIQUE MALDONADO PINEDA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Mar 16, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:03cr48-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 16, 2011)