Summary
holding that further identification of the government's proffered 5,000 documents was not required under Rule 16(E) where the government separately directed the defendants to materials it deemed most relevant, provided an indexed searchable database, and offered to provide its exhibit list and hard copies of the exhibits prior to the start of trial
Summary of this case from U.S. v. RichardsOpinion
CASE NO. 09-60129-CR-ZLOCH.
January 14, 2010
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (DE 118) filed herein by United States Magistrate Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the entire record herein and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
Accordingly, after due consideration, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report And Recommendation (DE 118) filed herein by United States Magistrate Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum, be and the same is hereby approved, adopted and ratified in all respects except as follows: Plaintiff shall have until noon on Tuesday,January 19, 2010, to provide Defendants with an exhibit list and a hard copy of all expected trial exhibits; and
2. Defendants Bruce Perraud and Thomas Raffanello's Motion To Compel Government To Identify Documents In Its Electronic Database On Which It Intends To Rely At Trial And Which Are Material To The Preparation Of The Defense And To Exclude All Other Documents (DE 91) be and the same is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with the terms of this Order and the Report of Magistrate Judge Rosenbaum (DE 118).
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida.