From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Perkins

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division
Mar 3, 2006
No. 03-30059-001 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. 03-30059-001.

March 3, 2006


OPINION


The Defendant has filed a motion for direction to U.S. Attorney. The Defendant states that after he met with Government agents following his sentencing on March 8, 2005, the Government indicated that it would file a motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). The Defendant states that he has since been inquiring of the Government as to the filing of a Rule 35(b) motion. The Defendant requests that the Government be directed to make a determination prior to the expiration of one year from the date of sentencing whether it intends to file a Rule 35(b) motion.

Ergo, the Defendant's motion for direction [d/e 68] is ALLOWED, to the extent that the Government is directed to respond to his motion by March 7, 2006.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Perkins

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division
Mar 3, 2006
No. 03-30059-001 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 3, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANA R. PERKINS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division

Date published: Mar 3, 2006

Citations

No. 03-30059-001 (C.D. Ill. Mar. 3, 2006)