From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Perez-Zepeda

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2008
264 F. App'x 620 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-30373.

Submitted January 14, 2008.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 18, 2008.

Wendy Olson, USBO, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip H. Gordon, Esq., Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-06-00025-EJL.

Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Julio Perez-Zepeda appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Perez-Zepeda's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, which is construed as a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver, see United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Perez-Zepeda

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2008
264 F. App'x 620 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Perez-Zepeda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PEREZ-ZEPEDA, aka…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 2008

Citations

264 F. App'x 620 (9th Cir. 2008)