Opinion
No. 06-10513.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed March 19, 2007.
Ronald C. Rachow, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Donald C. Gish, Esq., Sparks, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Brian E. Sandoval, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-06-00039-BES-VPC.
Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Ismael Perez-Zarco appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful re-entry by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Perez-Zarco contends that the district court erred in sentencing him because it failed to consider the discrepancies in sentencing between the fast-track and non-fast-track districts. Perez-Zarco's contentions are foreclosed. See United States v. Marcial-Santiago, 447 F.3d 715, 718-19 (9th Cir. 2006).