From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Perez-Lopez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 336
Oct 9, 2009
333 F. App'x 335 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-10276.

Submitted September 14, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 9, 2009.

Monte Cress Clausen, Assistant U.S., Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Enrique Rene Gonzales, Rio Rico, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 4:07-cr-01970-RCC.

Before SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Angel Perez-Lopez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Perez-Lopez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Perez-Lopez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 336
Oct 9, 2009
333 F. App'x 335 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Perez-Lopez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel PEREZ-LOPEZ, aka…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 336

Date published: Oct 9, 2009

Citations

333 F. App'x 335 (9th Cir. 2009)