From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Patton

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Feb 10, 2011
No. 3:10-CR-31 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:10-CR-31.

February 10, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


On December 28, 2010, the Honorable C. Clifford Shirley, United States Magistrate Judge, filed a Report and Recommendation ("R R") [Doc. 32] in which he recommended to deny Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 19]. The parties appeared before Judge Shirley for a motion hearing on November 5, 2010.

This matter is presently before the Court on Defendant's timely objections to the R R [Doc. 33]. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has undertaken a de novo review of those portions of the R R to which the Defendant objects.

Defendant does not raise any new arguments in his objections, and the Court finds itself in complete agreement with Judge Shirley's analysis of the legal issues. Consequently, Defendant's objections [Doc. 33] will be OVERRULED, the R R [Doc. 32] will be ACCEPTED IN WHOLE, and the underlying Motion to Suppress [Doc. 19] will be DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Patton

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Feb 10, 2011
No. 3:10-CR-31 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 10, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Patton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DEON T. PATTON

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Feb 10, 2011

Citations

No. 3:10-CR-31 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 10, 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lewis

Such questioning, without the benefit of Miranda warnings, must be deterred. United States v. Patton,…