From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Palomares

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Nov 14, 2007
CRIMINAL NO. 5:07-cr-68 (WDO) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 14, 2007)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 5:07-cr-68 (WDO).

November 14, 2007


ORDER


Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Docs. 19, 20). It appears to the Court that the Motion was filed before the Government provided complete discovery. As a result the Motion lacks specific allegations of fact to support Defendant's allegations that his constitutional rights were violated. See United States v. Richardson, 764 F.2d 1514, 1527 (11th Cir. 1985) ("A motion to suppress must in every critical respect be sufficiently definite, specific, detailed, and nonconjectural to enable the court to conclude that a substantial claim is presented."). It further appears that the Government has since fulfilled its duty to provide discovery. The Court therefore orders Defendant to amend his Motion to Suppress to include reference to specific facts that support his arguments in light of the discovery that the Government has provided to him. Defendant must amend the Motion no later than November 23, 2007, after which time the Court will proceed to rule on it.

So ordered.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Palomares

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Nov 14, 2007
CRIMINAL NO. 5:07-cr-68 (WDO) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 14, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Palomares

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE ANTONIO PALOMARES

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Nov 14, 2007

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 5:07-cr-68 (WDO) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 14, 2007)