From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Padilla

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Mar 15, 2005
403 F.3d 780 (1st Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 03-1918.

March 15, 2005.

Dina Michael Chaitowitz, John A. Wortmann, Jr., Peter K. Levitt, Virginia M. Vander Jagt, U.S. Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for Appellee.

George F. Gormley, George F. Gormley, PC, Boston, MA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge, TORRUELLA, SELYA, LYNCH, LIPEZ, and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER GRANTING REHEARING EN BANC

A majority of the judges of this court in active service have voted sua sponte to rehear en banc the questions of whether, to what extent, and in what manner plain-error review applies to improper delegations of sentencing authority of the type described in United States v. Melendez-Santana, 353 F.3d 93, 102-06 (1st Cir. 2003). The parties are required to submit supplemental briefs on these questions. Such briefs shall not exceed twenty pages per side, shall be in the form required by this court's local rules, and shall be filed on or before April 14, 2005. The en banc court will then schedule oral arguments. The court welcomes the submission of amicus briefs.

So much of the opinion of the court in this case as involves the questions to be reviewed, see United States v. Padilla, 393 F.3d 256, 258-59 (1st Cir. 2004); cf. id. at 259-61 (Campbell and Selya, JJ., concurring in the judgment); id. at 261-63 (Torruella, J., concurring), is withdrawn and the order for remand for resentencing on account of the Melendez-Santana error is hereby stayed.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Padilla

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Mar 15, 2005
403 F.3d 780 (1st Cir. 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Padilla

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Joel PADILLA, Defendant, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Date published: Mar 15, 2005

Citations

403 F.3d 780 (1st Cir. 2005)