Summary
distinguishing between third parties and assignees to written agreement
Summary of this case from Vitrano v. N.A.R., Inc.Opinion
No. 95-2836.
May 29, 1996.
Appeal from S.D.N.Y.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
U.S. v. Paccione
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 29, 1996
No. 95-2836 (2d Cir. May. 29, 1996)
Summaries of
U.S. v. Paccione
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 29, 1996
No. 95-2836 (2d Cir. May. 29, 1996)
distinguishing between third parties and assignees to written agreement
Summary of this case from Vitrano v. N.A.R., Inc.Case details for
U.S. v. Paccione
Case Details
Full title:U.S. v. Paccione
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: May 29, 1996
Citations
No. 95-2836 (2d Cir. May. 29, 1996)
Citing Cases
Vitrano v. N.A.R., Inc.
NAR is an assignee of Crest and stands in its shoes; thus, NAR is a party to the Lease, not a third party.…