From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Oxendine

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 28, 2010
399 F. App'x 819 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6864.

Submitted: October 19, 2010.

Decided: October 28, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00811-TLW-5).

Michael Oxendine, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michael Oxendine appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Oxendine, No. 4:04-cr-00811-TLW-5 (D.S.C. May 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Oxendine

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 28, 2010
399 F. App'x 819 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Oxendine

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael OXENDINE, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 28, 2010

Citations

399 F. App'x 819 (4th Cir. 2010)