From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Owens

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Dec 14, 2006
06-CR-72A (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2006)

Summary

noting that "incarcerated persons have a reduced expectation of privacy, including bodily privacy given that such privacy rights may be limited by institutional and security concerns"

Summary of this case from United States v. Soto

Opinion

06-CR-72A.

December 14, 2006


ORDER


This above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). On November 27, 2006, Magistrate Judge Foschio filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion to suppress be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties. No objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Foschio's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion to suppress is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Owens

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Dec 14, 2006
06-CR-72A (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2006)

noting that "incarcerated persons have a reduced expectation of privacy, including bodily privacy given that such privacy rights may be limited by institutional and security concerns"

Summary of this case from United States v. Soto
Case details for

U.S. v. Owens

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. AARON OWENS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2006

Citations

06-CR-72A (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Soto

The Defendant's incarceration in the Metropolitan Correctional Facility may result in diminished privacy…

United States v. Marshall

The government argues that "[t]o obtain buccal swabs for a DNA sample from a defendant who is in pretrial…