From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Olvis, 301 Fed.Appx. 206

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 1, 2008
301 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-7160.

Submitted: November 20, 2008.

Decided: December 1, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1).

Anthony L. Olvis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Anthony L. Olvis appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) "is subject to the discretion of the district court"); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm the district court's orders for the reasons stated therein. See United States v. Olvis, No. 4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2008; filed Apr. 29, 2008 entered May 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Olvis, 301 Fed.Appx. 206

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 1, 2008
301 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Olvis, 301 Fed.Appx. 206

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony L. OLVIS, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 1, 2008

Citations

301 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2008)