Opinion
No. 06-50366.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed August 22, 2007.
Michael J. Crowley, Esq., USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Alfredo Olmos-Huerta, San Diego, CA, pro se.
Elizabeth A. Missakian, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Napoleon A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-16-NAJ.
Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Alfredo Olmos-Huerta appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to bringing in illegal aliens without presentation and aggravated identity theft. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for substitute counsel. Olmos-Huerta's motion preceded his unconditional guilty plea, which constituted a waiver of the right to appeal all non-jurisdictional antecedent rulings. See United States v. Castillo, No. 05-30401, 496 F.3d. 947, 954, 2007 WL 2120232 (9th Cir. July 25, 2007) (en banc); United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 891, 126 S.Ct. 199, 163 L.Ed.2d 204 (2005). We therefore dismiss the appeal.