From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Oliver

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 21, 2007
Crim. File No. 06-124 (MJD/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 21, 2007)

Opinion

Crim. File No. 06-124 (MJD/RLE).

February 21, 2007

Elizabeth Altman, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Plaintiff.

Gary R. Bryant-Wolf, Counsel for Defendant.


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson dated December 21, 2006. Defendant Jeffery Lee Oliver filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including the transcripts of both hearings before the Chief Magistrate Judge and the exhibits submitted in conjunction with those hearings. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that review the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation dated December 21, 2006, as well as the incorporated Report and Recommendation dated June 5, 2006. As noted in the June 5, 2006 Report and Recommendation, Officer Engum followed appropriate protocol by requiring that the Expedition be towed and inventoried. United States v. Betterton, 417 F.3d 826, 830 (8th Cir. 2005).

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 21, 2006 [Docket No. 37].
2. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Docket No. 11] is DENIED.
3. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements [Docket No. 12] are DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Oliver

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 21, 2007
Crim. File No. 06-124 (MJD/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 21, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Oliver

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. (1) JEFFERY LEE OLIVER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 21, 2007

Citations

Crim. File No. 06-124 (MJD/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 21, 2007)