From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Nicholas

United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division
Sep 8, 2008
CASE NO. SA CR 08-00139 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. SA CR 08-00139.

September 8, 2008

Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr. ( pro hac vice), Gregory B. Craig ( pro hac vice), Barry S. Simon ( pro hac vice), Kevin M. Downey ( pro hac vice), WILLIAMS CONNOLLY LLP, Washington, DC.

James D. Riddet (State Bar No. 39826), STOKKE RIDDET, Santa Ana, CA, Attorneys for Dr. Henry T. Nicholas, III.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF HENRY T. NICHOLAS, III FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND NEW HEARING DATE


UPON CONSIDERATION of Henry T. Nicholas' Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Government's Opposition to Motion for Evidentiary Hearing Regarding AUSA Stolper's Potential Conflict of Interest, and New Hearing Date, and it appearing to the Court that the request should be granted,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

Dr. Nicholas may have until September 15, 2008 to file his reply to the Government's Opposition. A hearing concerning Dr. Nicholas' Motion for Evidentiary Hearing Regarding AUSA Stolper's Potential Conflict of Interest shall be held on September 22, 2008 at 1:30 p.m.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Nicholas

United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division
Sep 8, 2008
CASE NO. SA CR 08-00139 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Nicholas

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Henry T. Nicholas III, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 8, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. SA CR 08-00139 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2008)