From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Nguyen

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Mar 22, 2011
Case No. 08-10002-07-WEB (D. Kan. Mar. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 08-10002-07-WEB.

March 22, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Before the court is defendant's Motion pursuant to Rule 60(b). (Doc. 480). A review of the motion shows that defendant is "filing a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244 respectfully requesting permission to file a second petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255."

The district court does not have jurisdiction to address the merits of a second or successive section 2255 claims until the Court of Appeals grants authorization. United States v. Nelson, 465 F.3d 1145, 1148 (10th Cir. 2006). A second or successive petition for habeas corpus relief should be transferred to the Court of Appeals for authorization. Coleman v. United States, 106 F.3d 339, 341 (10th Cir. 1997).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDER that this motion be referred to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for authorization.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Nguyen

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Mar 22, 2011
Case No. 08-10002-07-WEB (D. Kan. Mar. 22, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Nguyen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THANH NGUYEN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Mar 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. 08-10002-07-WEB (D. Kan. Mar. 22, 2011)