From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Nguyen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 23, 2011
No. CR S-99-0433 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR S-99-0433 WBS GGH P.

September 23, 2011


ORDER


By stipulation and order, filed on June 9, 2011, petitioner's amended motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, was due to be filed on June 27, 2011, with the government's answer due thirty days later. Although signed by movant's counsel and dated as filed on June 27, 2011, the amended § 2255 motion was dated in the court's electronic docket system as filed a day later, on June 28, 2011. In any event, the court hereby deems any tardiness in filing the amended motion de minimis in this instance; however, the undersigned notes that respondent has failed to file a response and the time for doing so has long expired.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the government show cause for its failure to file a timely response to movant's amended § 2255 motion (docket # 1548), as well as file its response to the amended motion, within seven days of the date of its order.

DATED: September 22, 2011


Summaries of

U.S. v. Nguyen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 23, 2011
No. CR S-99-0433 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Nguyen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. SON VAN NGUYEN, Movant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 23, 2011

Citations

No. CR S-99-0433 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2011)