From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Nelson

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 3, 2011
2:10-CR-026 JCM (RJJ) (D. Nev. May. 3, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-CR-026 JCM (RJJ).

May 3, 2011


ORDER


Presently before the court is defendant Kathy Nelson's pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. #50).

On January 21, 2011, the court accepted Mrs. Nelson's guilty plea to escape, and sentenced her to fifteen (15) months custody to be followed by three (3) years of supervised release. (Doc. #35). Following the imposition of sentence, defendant filed several pro se motions/notices, including; a motion to correct sentence (doc. #36), a notice of appeal (doc. #38), a motion for appointment of counsel for appeal (doc. #40), a notice of withdrawal of appeal (doc. #44), and a motion to vacate (doc. #45). As defendant Nelson was represented by counsel and was not permitted to file pro se motions, the court entered an order striking the above mentioned filings. (Doc. #46).

Subsequently, on March 23, 2011, defendant Nelson sent a letter to the court requesting the status of her motion to vacate, and updating her address. The court filed the letter on March 28, 2011 (doc. #48), and resent her a copy of the order striking her pro se filings (doc. #46). On April 1, 2011, the court received another letter from Mrs. Nelson (Attached to doc. #49), this time requesting that counsel remove himself from her case. Included in the letter to the court, was a copy of a letter that she mailed to counsel requesting that he remove himself from the case "[i]n order to allow [her] to file [a] pro se[] motion" to vacate. (Attached to Doc. #49). On April 12, 2011, the court forwarded defendant Nelson's letters to counsel (doc. #49).

To date, defendant Nelson is still represented by counsel, and the court has not been notified of any intention to withdraw or substitution of counsel. On April 18, 2011, defendant Nelson filed the present pro se motion to vacate her sentence (doc. #50).

As the court has previously ruled, "[a] party who has appeared by attorney cannot while so represented appear or act in the case." Local Rule IA 10-6(a). Since defendant Nelson continues to be represented by counsel, she is not permitted to file pro se motions. As such, her pro se motion to vacate (doc. #50) is denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendant Kathy Nelson's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (doc. #50) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Nelson

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 3, 2011
2:10-CR-026 JCM (RJJ) (D. Nev. May. 3, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KATHY NELSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

2:10-CR-026 JCM (RJJ) (D. Nev. May. 3, 2011)