From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Nelson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 20, 2007
254 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-50204.

Submitted October 22, 2007.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 20, 2007.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Terri K. Flynn, Esq., USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Vicki Marolt Buchanan, Esq., Newport Beach, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

David Daniel Nelson, Covina, CA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00101-CAS-01.

Before: B. FLETCHER, WARDLAW, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

David Daniel Nelson appeals from his 8-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Andera v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Nelson's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant an opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Pennon v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Nelson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 20, 2007
254 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. David Daniel NELSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 20, 2007

Citations

254 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2007)