From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Munoz

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 21, 2008
4:08CR3069 (D. Neb. Nov. 21, 2008)

Opinion

4:08CR3069.

November 21, 2008


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (filing 30) that Defendant's motion to suppress (filing 19) be denied and the objections to the Recommendation (filing 33), filed as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

I have conducted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a de novo review of the portions of the Report, Recommendation, and Order to which objections have been made. Inasmuch as Judge Piester has fully, carefully, and correctly applied the law to the facts, I need only state that the Recommendation should be adopted, Defendant's objections to the Recommendation should be denied, and Defendant's motion to suppress should be denied.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (filing 30) is adopted;
2. Defendant's objections to the Recommendation (filing 33) are denied; and
3. Defendant's motion to suppress (filing 19) is denied.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Munoz

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 21, 2008
4:08CR3069 (D. Neb. Nov. 21, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Munoz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARCOS ANDREW MUNOZ, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Nov 21, 2008

Citations

4:08CR3069 (D. Neb. Nov. 21, 2008)

Citing Cases

United States v. Denby

Having seen a marijuana pipe in Denby's vehicle, Campfield had probable cause to search that vehicle. United…

United States v. Crawford

SeeGillon, 348 F.3d at 759-60. (finding seizure of drugs viewed through a vehicle's window constitutional…