From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Moussaoui

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division
Jan 7, 2003
Criminal No. 01-455-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2003)

Opinion

Criminal No. 01-455-A

January 7, 2003


ORDER


Certain discovery disputes in this case have centered around the defense's claim that the United States has failed to provide it with information retrieved from various computers used by Mr. Moussaoui in 2001, including evidence of his purported "xdesertman" Hotmail account. In response to our Order of August 27, 2002 and standby defense counsel's requests for specific information regarding hard drive identification and authentication, the United States has submitted multiple affidavits explaining why it has been unable to recover evidence of the alleged "xdesertman" account from Hotmail, Kinkos, the computer in the apartment Mr. Moussaoui shared with Mukkarum Ali, and computers at the University of Oklahoma Mr. Moussaoui claims to have used.

See pleadings docketed as #s 418, 435, 440, 449, 497, 544 and 705.

Although standby counsel request that we order the United States to continue its search for the alleged "xdesertman" account, we find that the United States has more than adequately complied with our Order of August 27, 2002. It has provided standby counsel with the requested information about the authentication of the computer hard drives produced to the defense in discovery, a chart identifying the sources of each hard drive produced, confirmation that the University of Oklahoma hard drive at issue had not been contaminated, clarification regarding the BIOS settings for and the timing of the CART examination of Mr. Moussaoui's laptop computer, an explanation for the discrepancy between certain IP addresses, and the identity of the commercial software used by the University of Oklahoma to "ghost" or restore a previously recorded hard drive image.

Because the defense possesses the computer hard drives at issue and has expert resources and subpoena power, we find that the defense is just as capable as the United States to conduct any further examinations and investigation it deems necessary and appropriate. Accordingly, the defendant's pro se Motion to Recover xdesertman in the Sea of Lie [sic] of the US (Docket #497), the requests contained in Standby Counsel's Reply (Docket #544) and the defendant's pro se Motion to Force CIA and NSA Action to the Open Arena (Docket #705) are DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to the defendant, pro se; counsel for the United States; and standby defense counsel.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Moussaoui

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division
Jan 7, 2003
Criminal No. 01-455-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2003)
Case details for

U.S. v. Moussaoui

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI, a/k/a "Shaqil," a/k/a "Abu…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division

Date published: Jan 7, 2003

Citations

Criminal No. 01-455-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2003)