From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mott

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 1, 2009
328 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-6432.

Submitted: June 22, 2009.

Decided: July 1, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:00-cr-00046-RLV-3).

Robert Eugene Mott, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Robert Eugene Mott appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Mott, No. 5:00-cr-00046-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2009). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009). We deny Mott's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mott

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 1, 2009
328 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mott

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Eugene MOTT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 1, 2009

Citations

328 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2009)