The defendant's long history of dangerous conduct thus indicates that incarceration is required to protect the public. See generally United States v. Moore-Bey, 981 F. Supp. 688, 689-90 (D.D.C. 1997) (denying departure based on long criminal history, which included numerous bank robberies); United States v. Bradshaw, No. 96 CR 485-1, 1999 WL 1129601, at *3-4 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 3, 1999) (denying departure in bank robbery case where 13 prior convictions included two armed robberies, robbery with threat of force, and aggravated battery). The Guidelines also do not permit a departure where the "facts and circumstances" of the instant offense "indicate a need to protect the public because the offense involved actual violence or a serious threat of violence." U.S.S.G. ยง 5K2.13.