From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Moore

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Apr 8, 2010
CASE NO. 1:98-CR-66 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 8, 2010)

Summary

following entry of final judgment, if no direct appeal is filed a case is no longer pending and Rule 12(b)(B) cannot be invoked to challenge jurisdiction

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Lebron

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:98-CR-66.

April 8, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court referred this matter to the United States Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin for consideration of the defendant's motions to dismiss the indictment in this case. Judge Giblin issued findings of fact and a report and recommendation on the motions. The magistrate judge recommended that the Court deny the defendant's motions to dismiss.

The parties have not objected to the magistrate judge's findings. The Court accepts the findings in the report and recommendation. The Court ORDERS that Judge Giblin's report (#30) is adopted. The Court further ORDERS that the defendant's motions to dismiss the indictment (#27, #29) are DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Moore

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Apr 8, 2010
CASE NO. 1:98-CR-66 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 8, 2010)

following entry of final judgment, if no direct appeal is filed a case is no longer pending and Rule 12(b)(B) cannot be invoked to challenge jurisdiction

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Lebron
Case details for

U.S. v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ELVIS DEVILLE MOORE

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Apr 8, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 1:98-CR-66 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Lebron

e case is no longer "pending" within the meaning of that rule once direct appeals ave ended."); United States…