Opinion
2:05-cr-50-FtM-29SPC.
February 7, 2006
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on defendant's pro se Motion to Dismiss Counsel (Doc. #86), filed on February 7, 2006. Defendant is currently represented by counsel and under Local Rule 2.03(d), "[a]ny party for whom a general appearance of counsel has been made shall not thereafter take any step or be heard in the case in proper person, absent prior leave of Court. . . ." Therefore, defendant's Motion will be stricken.See also United States v. Cruz, 153 Fed. Appx. 604, 605 (11th Cir. 2005).
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Defendant's pro se Motion to Dismiss Counsel (Doc. #86) is stricken.
DONE AND ORDERED.