Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

U.S. v. Moody

433 F. App'x 785 (11th Cir. 2011)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
U.S. v. Moody

5 Citing cases

  1. Story v. United States

    No. 2:17-CV-00144-JRG-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 19, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    (citations omitted)); see also United States v. Moody, 433 F. App'x 785, 787 (11th Cir. 2011) ("The reasonableness of a sentence may be indicated when the sentence imposed was well below the statutory maximum sentence." (citing United States v. Gonzalez, 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008))), cert. denied, 557 U.S. 928 (2009); United States v. Foreman, 401 F. App'x 102, 104 (6th Cir. 2010) ("The sentence [the defendant] received was below the statutory maximum and was adequately supported by § 3553(a) factors.

  2. Freeman v. United States

    2:19-CV-00008-JRG-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Dec. 15, 2023)

    See United States v. Peterman, 249 F.3d 458, 462 (6th Cir. 2001) (“Courts have generally declined to collaterally review sentences that fall within the statutory maximum.” (citations omitted)); see also United States v. Moody, 433 Fed.Appx. 785, 787 (11th Cir. 2011) (“The reasonableness of a sentence may be indicated when the sentence imposed was well below the statutory maximum sentence.” (citing United States v. Gonzalez, 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008))), cert. denied, 557 U.S. 928 (2009); United States v. Foreman, 401 Fed.Appx. 102, 104 (6th Cir. 2010) (“The sentence [the defendant] received was below the statutory maximum and was adequately supported by § 3553(a) factors.

  3. Freeman v. United States

    2:19-CV-00008-JRG-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 20, 2023)

    See United States v. Peterman, 249 F.3d 458, 462 (6th Cir. 2001) (“Courts have generally declined to collaterally review sentences that fall within the statutory maximum.” (citations omitted)); see also United States v. Moody, 433 Fed.Appx. 785, 787 (11th Cir. 2011) (“The reasonableness of a sentence may be indicated when the sentence imposed was well below the statutory maximum sentence.” (citing United States v. Gonzalez, 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008))), cert. denied, 557 U.S. 928 (2009); United States v. Foreman, 401 Fed.Appx. 102, 104 (6th Cir. 2010) (“The sentence [the defendant] received was below the statutory maximum and was adequately supported by § 3553(a) factors.

  4. Hasan v. United States

    2:19-CV-00100-JRG-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 5, 2023)

    See United States v. Peterman, 249 F.3d 458, 462 (6th Cir. 2001) (“Courts have generally declined to collaterally review sentences that fall within the statutory maximum.” (citations omitted)); see also United States v. Moody, 433 Fed.Appx. 785, 787 (11th Cir. 2011) (“The reasonableness of a sentence may be indicated when the sentence imposed was well below the statutory maximum sentence.” (citing United States v. Gonzalez, 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008))), cert. denied, 557 U.S. 928 (2009); United States v. Foreman, 401 Fed.Appx. 102, 104 (6th Cir. 2010) (“The sentence . . . received was below the statutory maximum and was adequately supported by § 3553(a) factors.

  5. Williams v. United States

    No. 2:18-CV-00053-JRG-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 28, 2021)

    (citations omitted)); see also United States v. Moody, 433 F. App'x 785, 787 (11th Cir. 2011) ("The reasonableness of a sentence may be indicated when the sentence imposed was well below the statutory maximum sentence." (citing United States v. Gonzalez, 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008))), cert. denied, 557 U.S. 928 (2009); United States v. Foreman, 401 F. App'x 102, 104 (6th Cir. 2010) ("The sentence [the defendant] received was below the statutory maximum and was adequately supported by § 3553(a) factors.