From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Moncrief

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 23, 2009
356 F. App'x 11 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-10417.

Argued and Submitted September 15, 2009.

Filed October 23, 2009.

Kathleen Bliss, Esquire, Gregory A. Brower, U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Augustas T. Claus, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:08-CR-00020-PMP-RJJ-1.

Before: SCHROEDER, REINHARDT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.


Dennis Moncrief ("Moncrief") appeals his 180-month sentence imposed pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"). We affirm.

Under the "categorical approach" delineated by the Supreme Court in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990), the Tennessee aggravated burglary statute is broader than the generic definition of burglary because it extends to tents and motor homes. Tenn. Code § 39-14-403; United States v. Grisel, 488 F.3d 844, 848-49 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc) ("building or structure" as used in Taylor limited to structures designed for occupancy and intended for use in one place). Nonetheless, the Tennessee aggravated burglary statute satisfies the ACCA's "residual clause" because it "otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another." 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). Because the Tennessee statute is limited to places that are "designed or adapted for the overnight accommodation of persons" and thus likely to be occupied, it presents the same risk of confrontation and physical injury as the generic crime. See United States v. Mayer, 560 F.3d 948, 963 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 158, 175 L.Ed.2d 100 (2009); James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192, 212, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007).

As Moncrief six Tennessee convictions are more than sufficient for the ACCA enhancement, we need not reach his arguments regarding his Colorado convictions.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Moncrief

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 23, 2009
356 F. App'x 11 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Moncrief

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis MONCRIEF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 23, 2009

Citations

356 F. App'x 11 (9th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Moncrief

See PSR ¶¶ 39, 41, 43. Moncrief appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed, explicitly holding that…