From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Molen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 25, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0614 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0614 LKK KJM PS.

February 25, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On August 31, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 31, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted and judgment for plaintiff is entered on all claims.

3. The UCC Financing Statement filed by James O. Molen and Sandra L. Molen on November 8, 2004, with th Secretary of State of the State of California, Document Number 04-7005304023, is adjudged and declared null, void and without legal effect.

4. Leave is granted to file the order or judgment with the California Secretary of State, any county clerk's office, assessor's office, or other public registry where such liens have or will be filed by defendants.

5. James O. Molen and Sandra L. Molen are permanently enjoined from filing, or attempting to file, any document or instrument that purports to create a nonconsensual lien or encumbrance against the person or property of any government employee.

6. The United States' request for attorney's fees is granted in the amount of $2,726.00 as this action was caused by the defendants' vexatious conduct in filing false liens.

7. To the extent that defendants' filings constitute motions, said motions are denied for lack of factual and legal merit. The defendants' motion to dismiss is denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Molen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 25, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0614 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2007)
Case details for

United States v. Molen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES O. MOLEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 25, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0614 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2007)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. McGugan

taxpayer from filing any documents or instruments of that kind against any employee of the federal…

United States v. Marty

se "baseless" "common-law liens" against judge, magistrate judges, and attorneys involved in taxpayer's…