From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mohammed

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Feb 28, 2010
No. CIV 07-240 JB/RHS, No. CR 03-0569 JB (D.N.M. Feb. 28, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV 07-240 JB/RHS, No. CR 03-0569 JB.

February 28, 2010

Gregory J. Fouratt United States Attorney, Presiliano Torrez Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorneys Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for the Plaintiff/Respondent.

Omar Mohammed, FCI Victorville II, Adelanto, California, Defendant/Movant Pro Se.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition, filed January 22, 2010 (Doc. 18) ("PFRD"). No objections have been filed to the PFRD. Having considered the same, the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge's PFRD. Defendant/Movant Omar Mohammed indicated in a letter to the Court that his counsel informed him of the Supreme Court of the United States' decision to deny his petition for a writ of certiorari on or about March 21, 2006. See Letter to Judge Scott, filed September 25, 2009 (Doc. 17). The Court additionally notes that an entry on criminal docket in Mohammed's case, entered March 9, 2006, states that the Court received a letter from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit indicating that the Supreme Court had denied Mohammed's petition for a writ of certiorari. Mohammed, therefore, had notice of the status of his petition in March 2006, eleven months before his § 2255 needed to be filed. In such a situation, equitable tolling is not appropriate. Accordingly, the Court will deny Mohammed's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismiss this civil proceeding.

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition is adopted by the Court, Defendant/Movant Omar Mohammed's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, and Authority in Support Thereof Brought Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section § 2255 (Doc. 1) is denied, and this civil proceeding is dismissed with prejudice, and that any pending motions are denied as moot.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mohammed

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Feb 28, 2010
No. CIV 07-240 JB/RHS, No. CR 03-0569 JB (D.N.M. Feb. 28, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mohammed

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. OMAR MOHAMMED…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Feb 28, 2010

Citations

No. CIV 07-240 JB/RHS, No. CR 03-0569 JB (D.N.M. Feb. 28, 2010)