From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mitchell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 2, 2007
No. CR. S-06-0078 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2007)

Opinion

No. CR. S-06-0078 WBS.

March 2, 2007

McGREGOR W. SCOTT, United States Attorney, PHILIP A. FERRARI, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, California.


ORDER


This matter came before the Court for a status conference on February 26, 2007. The United States was represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Philip A. Ferrari; the defendant was represented by Dina Santos, Esq.

At the hearing, the parties were informed that the Court's calendar would not allow the case to go to trial on March 13, 2007. The defendant indicated his preference to try the case in this Court rather than have the case reassigned. In addition, counsel for the defendant indicated that she required additional time to adequately prepare for trial, including further review of discovery and interviewing of witnesses. The Court was also informed that the defendant had made discovery requests which were currently the subject of negotiation between the parties and which could require litigation. Thus, at the defendant's request, the date for the jury trial was continued to April 17, 2007. A Trial Confirmation Hearing was set for March 26, 2007. Both parties agreed that the time from February 26, 2007, through April 17, 2007, could properly be excluded from computation under the speedy trial act so that defense counsel could adequately prepare for trial.

Based upon the representations by counsel and the stipulation of the parties, the Court excluded time under those provisions of the Speedy Trial Act relating to reasonable time to prepare. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv); Local Code T4. The Court directed government counsel to prepare a formal order.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Jury trial is set to commence on April 17, 2007.

2. A Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for March 26, 2007, at 8:30 a.m.

2. Based upon the above representations and stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded from February 26, 2007, through April 17, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mitchell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 2, 2007
No. CR. S-06-0078 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2007)
Case details for

United States v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CALVIN MITCHELL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 2, 2007

Citations

No. CR. S-06-0078 WBS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2007)