From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mitchell

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 7, 2008
268 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7570.

Submitted: February 28, 2008.

Decided: March 7, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:03-cr-00590-SB).

Arthur A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Arthur A. Mitchell appeals the district court's order denying his motions for preparation of a transcript at Government expense and an extension of time in which to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 9:03-cr-00590-SB (D.S.C. filed Oct. 9, 2007 entered Oct. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mitchell

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 7, 2008
268 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur A. MITCHELL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 7, 2008

Citations

268 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2008)