Opinion
No. CR05-5733FDB.
February 10, 2006
Russell V. Leonard, Attorney for Defendant.
Gregory Gruber, Assistant United States Attorney.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DEFENSE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
Based on the stipulated defense motion to continue the trial date, and the affidavit of defense counsel in support of the motion, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
1. The ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).
2. Proceeding to trial absent adequate time for the defense to prepare would result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(I).
3. The defense needs additional time to explore issues of some complexity, including all relevant issues and defenses applicable to the case, which would make it unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for trial itself within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act and currently set for this case. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8) (B(ii).
4. Taking into account the exercise of due diligence, a continuance is necessary to allow the defendant the reasonable time for effective preparation his defense. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).
NOW, THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date is continued from March 6, 2006 to June 12, 2006, at 9:00 am. The resulting period of delay from March 6, 2006, up to and including the new trial date of June 12, 2006, is hereby excluded for speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).
Pre-trial motions are due no later than March 6, 2006.
Pre-trial conference shall be on May 25, 2006, at 2:00 pm.