From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Migi

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 26, 2007
256 F. App'x 155 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-10047.

Submitted November 13, 2007.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 26, 2007.

Susan Cushman, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Clayton K. Kimoto, Esq., Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-99-00276-DAE.

Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Iupeli Migi appeals from the district court's revocation of his supervised release.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Migi's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Migi

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 26, 2007
256 F. App'x 155 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

United States v. Migi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Iupeli MIGI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 26, 2007

Citations

256 F. App'x 155 (9th Cir. 2007)