From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Microsoft Corp.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 8, 2001
Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK), Civil Action No. 98-1233 (CKK) (D.D.C. Oct. 8, 2001)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK), Civil Action No. 98-1233 (CKK).

October 8, 2001


ORDER


Lonnie G. Schmidt has filed a motion for leave to intervene, pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A party has a right to intervene when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and the applicant is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the applicant s ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant s interest is adequately represented by existing parties. Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2). Proposed intervenor does not meet any of these criteria.

A party maybe permitted to intervene when an applicant s claim or defense and the main action have a question of law or fact in common. Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b)(2). Courts considering permissive intervention are instructed to consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties. Id. In this instance, the Court finds that the burden of an additional party will likely cause such undue delay and prejudice.

Base on the foregoing, it is this 8th day of October, 2001, hereby

ORDERED that Lonnie G. Schmidt s motion to intervene is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Microsoft Corp.

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Oct 8, 2001
Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK), Civil Action No. 98-1233 (CKK) (D.D.C. Oct. 8, 2001)
Case details for

U.S. v. Microsoft Corp.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Oct 8, 2001

Citations

Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK), Civil Action No. 98-1233 (CKK) (D.D.C. Oct. 8, 2001)