From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mekavong

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 847
Aug 17, 2009
334 F. App'x 846 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-30441.

Submitted August 11, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 17, 2009.

Todd Greenberg, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Terrence Kellogg, Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-07-00048-02-JLR.

Before KLEINFELD, M. SMITH, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Theune Mekavong appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21. U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Mekavong's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mekavong

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 847
Aug 17, 2009
334 F. App'x 846 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mekavong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theune MEKAVONG…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 847

Date published: Aug 17, 2009

Citations

334 F. App'x 846 (9th Cir. 2009)