From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. McReynolds

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 10, 2007
Case No. 92-81097 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 10, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 92-81097.

October 10, 2007


OPINION AND ORDER


On October 4, 2006, Defendant pled guilty pursuant to a Rule 11 Plea Agreement to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine. This Court sentenced Defendant on May 22, 2007. Presently before the Court is Defendant's motion seeking the return of certain property in the possession of the Akron, Ohio office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. At the Court's request, the Government filed a response to Defendant's motion on August 27, 2007.

In his motion, Defendant fails to identify the property that he seeks returned. He also fails to cite any authority for this Court to order the return of said property. To the extent Defendant is relying on Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, his motion should be filed in the district where the property was seized.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, that Defendant's motion for the return of property is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. McReynolds

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 10, 2007
Case No. 92-81097 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 10, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. McReynolds

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM McREYNOLDS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 10, 2007

Citations

Case No. 92-81097 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 10, 2007)