From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. McFarland

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 4, 2002
281 F.3d 506 (5th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

No. 00-10569.

February 4, 2002.

Kathleen A. Felton, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div. App. Section, Washington, DC, Delonia Anita Watson (argued), Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen U. Baer (argued), Baer Associates, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Terry R. Means, Judge.

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 29, 2001, 5 Cir., 2001, 264 F.3d 557)


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

U.S. v. McFarland

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 4, 2002
281 F.3d 506 (5th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

U.S. v. McFarland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James McFARLAND, Jr.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 4, 2002

Citations

281 F.3d 506 (5th Cir. 2002)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hays

The Fifth Circuit has since voted to rehear McFarland en banc. United States v. McFarland, 281 F.3d 506 (5th…

U.S. v. McFarland

The Court subsequently took the case en banc. United States v. McFarland, 281 F.3d 506 (5th Cir. 2002). Facts…