From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mcclelland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 3, 2010
393 F. App'x 991 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6711.

Submitted: August 26, 2010.

Decided: September 3, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-13).

Anthony Dewayne McClelland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Anthony Dewayne McClelland appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McClelland, No. 5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-13 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2010). We deny McClelland's motion to appoint counsel and motion to produce 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2006) notice. We dispense with oral' argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mcclelland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 3, 2010
393 F. App'x 991 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mcclelland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Dewayne…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 3, 2010

Citations

393 F. App'x 991 (4th Cir. 2010)