From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Matus

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
No. 1:05-cr-00276 OWW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:05-cr-00276 OWW.

February 1, 2006

DENNIS S. WAKS, #142581, Acting Federal Defender FRANCINE ZEPEDA, Bar #091175, Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service, Fresno, California. Attorney for Defendant, ARTHUR MATUS.

McGREGOR W. SCOTT, United States Attorney KIMBERLY A. KELLY, Assistant United States Attorney, Counsel for Plaintiff.


STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTIONS FILING AND HEARING AND ORDER THEREON


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that a new motions schedule be set as follows: defendant's motions shall be filed on or before January 30, 2006, government responses to be filed on or before February 22, 2006, and the hearing on motions now set for January 30, 2006, may be continued to February 28, 2006, at 9:00 A.M.

The continuance is at the request of defense counsel to provide her additional time for defense preparation and further investigation, and to allow the parties additional time for plea negotiation and preparation of a plea agreement.

The parties also agree that any delay resulting from this continuance shall be excluded in the interest of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(F), 3161(h)(8)(A), and 3161(h)(8)(B)(i) and (iv).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded in the interest of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(F), 3161(h)(8)(A) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).


Summaries of

United States v. Matus

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
No. 1:05-cr-00276 OWW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Matus

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR MATUS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2006

Citations

No. 1:05-cr-00276 OWW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)