From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mascolo

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 27, 2011
NO. CR. S-96-397 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CR. S-96-397 LKK.

October 27, 2011


ORDER


The defendant was convicted in case number Cr. S-96-397. He has, in the past, filed a "motion to vacate" and a "motion to dismiss restitution". Both motions were denied. He has now filed a "motion to set aside the judgment". That motion is DENIED.

As to any further motions, the court will not specifically address them. If there is no response in thirty (30) days, the defendant may take that as a denial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 26, 2011.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mascolo

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 27, 2011
NO. CR. S-96-397 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mascolo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALBERT MASCOLO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

NO. CR. S-96-397 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)