From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Martinez-Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 17, 2011
411 F. App'x 608 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-6855.

Submitted: February 10, 2011.

Decided: February 17, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cr-00287-BR-1; 5:10-cv-00116-BR).

Pedro Martinez-Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Evenson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Pedro Martinez-Hernandez seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martinez-Hernandez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Martinez-Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 17, 2011
411 F. App'x 608 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Martinez-Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 17, 2011

Citations

411 F. App'x 608 (4th Cir. 2011)