From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Marshall

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Oct 7, 2011
09-CR-6116 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

09-CR-6116.

October 7, 2011


DECISION and ORDER


Siragusa, J. This case was referred by order of the undersigned, entered August 27, 2009, to Magistrate Judge Jonathan W. Feldman, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). On December 4, 2009, Defendant filed an omnibus motion (Docket # 65) seeking various forms of relief. At oral argument on his omnibus motion, held on March 16, 2010, Defendant orally requested and was granted permission to join in the application of co-defendant, Joseph B. Thompson, to suppress Title III eavesdropping evidence. In that regard, Magistrate Judge Feldman filed a Report and Recommendation ("R R") (Docket # 198) recommending that the Court deny Defendant's motion to suppress the eavesdropping evidence be denied. The time has passed for Defendant to file any objections to the R R, and none have been filed.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Feldman's R R, Defendant's oral application to suppress eavesdropping evidence is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: Rochester, New York

October 6, 2011


Summaries of

U.S. v. Marshall

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Oct 7, 2011
09-CR-6116 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. WAYNE MARSHALL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

09-CR-6116 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2011)