From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 18, 2008
303 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-7260.

Submitted: November 17, 2008.

Decided: December 18, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00076-JBF-TEM-1).

Julius Josephus Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Julius Josephus Marshall appeals the district court's order granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Marshall, No. 2:03-cr-00076-JBF-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 3, 2008 entered July 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 18, 2008
303 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julius Josephus MARSHALL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 18, 2008

Citations

303 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2008)