From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 15, 2009
306 F. App'x 825 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-7363.

Submitted: January 13, 2009.

Decided: January 15, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00002-RGD-TEM-1).

Monty Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Monty Williams appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 706, as modified by Amendment 711, and Amendment 715 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marshall, No. 4:02-cr-0002-RGD-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. July 14, 2008). In addition, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 15, 2009
306 F. App'x 825 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Monty MARSHALL, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 15, 2009

Citations

306 F. App'x 825 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Marshall v. United States

Monty MARSHALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.Case below, 306 Fed.Appx. 825. Petition for writ of certiorari…