From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Marias

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 15, 1997
Civil Action No. 96-8198, (Criminal No. 92-256-2) (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 1997)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 96-8198, (Criminal No. 92-256-2).

August 15, 1997


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Presently before the court is defendant-petitioner's "Request for the Production of Documents." Petitioner's broad request seeks all discovery, reports, analysis, logs, lists memorandum, correspondence and transcripts pertaining to his criminal case. Petitioner does not specify why he needs all this material.

Petitioner was a principal participant in a large scale drug distribution operation in Philadelphia. He pled guilty on January 14, 1994 to conspiring to distribute cocaine and was sentenced on April 22, 1994 to a period of incarceration of 97 months.

Petitioner has not made the "strong showing of particularized need" necessary to justify disclosure of transcripts of grand jury proceedings. See U.S. v. Sells Engineering, Inc., 463 U.S. 418, 443 (1983); Illinois v. Abbot Associates, Inc., 460 U.S. 557, 567 (1983); U.S. v. Kim, 577 F.2d 473, 478 (9th Cir. 1978) (desire to conduct "fishing expedition" does not constitute "particularized need"); U.S. v. Rising, 867 F.2d 1255, 1260 (10th Cir. 1989) (general claim that disclosure of grand jury transcripts will reveal exculpatory evidence does not demonstrate particularized need); U.S. v. Short, 671 F.2d 178, 187 (6th Cir. 1982) (same); Thomas v. U.S., 597 F.2d 656, 657-58 (8th Cir. 1979) (no particularized need shown where petitioner asserts grand jury minutes necessary to prove matters he wished to pursue in § 2255 petition and may "very well prove all [his] allegations").

A federal prisoner seeking collaterally to attack his conviction is not entitled to free transcripts or records. U.S. v. MacCollum, 426 U.S. 317, 325-26 (1976). He may obtain such material only if a judge certifies that it is necessary to decide an issue presented in a non-frivolous petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994); MacCollum, 426 U.S. at 325.

There is no apparent justification for petitioner's broad request for documents. The court will not compel their production.

ACCORDINGLY, this day of August, 1997, upon consideration of petitioner's Request for the Production of Documents, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said request is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Marias

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 15, 1997
Civil Action No. 96-8198, (Criminal No. 92-256-2) (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 1997)
Case details for

U.S. v. Marias

Case Details

Full title:U.S. v. JOSE MARIAS, a/k/a JOSE GONZALES

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 15, 1997

Citations

Civil Action No. 96-8198, (Criminal No. 92-256-2) (E.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 1997)