From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mansell

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
May 12, 2006
Civil No. 05-2178, Criminal No. 2:00-20048 (W.D. Ark. May. 12, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-2178, Criminal No. 2:00-20048.

May 12, 2006


ORDER


On this 12th day of May, 2006, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on April 17, 2006, by the Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 26). No objections have been filed to the report and recommendation.

The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion (Doc. 33) is DISMISSED as barred by the statute of limitations or substantively without merit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mansell

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
May 12, 2006
Civil No. 05-2178, Criminal No. 2:00-20048 (W.D. Ark. May. 12, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mansell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent v. CLAUDE MANSELL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division

Date published: May 12, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-2178, Criminal No. 2:00-20048 (W.D. Ark. May. 12, 2006)

Citing Cases

Whitelaw v. U.S.

Id. at *2. Similarly, inUnited States v. Mansell, Civil No. 05-2178, 2006 WL 1313164, (W.D.Ark. May 12,…

Carter v. United States

Even this Rule Rule 60(b) had been timely filed, he would still not be entitled to relief as "[l]ack of…